Conte will receive an automatic one-game suspension for his reaction to the decision, which prevents him from being on the touchline in Marseille.
Depending on what is written in the match report by the referee, he may receive additional punishment.
When Conte took his one and only question from reporters in his press conference shortly after full-time, he acknowledged that he was still "really upset.
"Depending on the match delegate report, he might still be the subject of an investigation for his comments after the game.
Conte elaborated, "The referee decided to send me off after all the people came onto the pitch.
"When the ball is in front of Kane, I think there are times when you can understand why you just disallowed a regular goal.
"You are aware that I do not comment on the decision made by the referee, but this season in the Premier League and Champions League, we have not had the best luck with VAR.
"I believe it causes significant damage.
I'd like to see this kind of decision with a top team in a crucial game. I'd like to see if the video assistant referee is brave enough to make this decision, which is unfair because Kane has the ball.
"Sorry, but I'm really upset because sometimes you can accept this situation, but other times I think it's bad because I don't see honesty in this kind of situation, and when I don't see this, I get really, really upset.
Sometimes you can accept this situation, but other times you can't.
"I think we played the game with a low level of intensity in the first half, and Sporting Lisbon deserved to keep their 1-0 lead.
After our second half, I believe we deserved three points at the conclusion of the game.
However, we must wait until the final game against Marseille before making this decision."
In the event that Tottenham fail to advance to the knockout stages, Conte also urged them to "speak to the right people."
He stated: I repeat, this choice causes significant harm.
I trust the club comprehends this and afterward in the right circumstance to talk with individuals that they need to address, generally just the director talks.
Given the extent of the damage this situation has caused, I believe the club must be strong. Now that we don't know what will happen the following week, I want to see if we go out."
When Emerson Royal, a Spurs wingback, kicked the ball back toward Kane in the Sporting area, Kane was behind Royal. Kane finished first time after the ball deflected off a defender and dropped in front of him to appear to win the game for the hosts.
However, it was determined that Kane was offside because he was slightly in front of the ball when Emerson headed it in his direction after a VAR check that took several minutes and left those in the stadium wondering whether Tottenham had actually secured their spot in the next round.
Yes. Even if the ball is passed backwards, the receiving player may still be offside when they receive it.
Kane's offside position was not reset in this instance because the deflection that brought the ball into Kane's path is not regarded as a deliberate play.
Despite Spurs' protestations, Eric Dier yelled, "the ball went backwards!" despite the fact that this type of incident is uncommon and undoubtedly painful for the team.to officials following the game: this was legal.
It seemed like an eternity while I was watching it live. They've examined it from a variety of perspectives.
They have attempted to cross the lines, but it was difficult, there is no question about that. He appears to be just behind the ball from one angle.
I can understand why the fans in the crowd became increasingly irate as the game progressed. Everyone agreed that we would accept a decision that takes a little longer to make when we entered VAR. Three and a half minutes were never anticipated.
"It just demonstrates that it is not as simple or clear-cut as everyone claimed. It frustrate
ALSO READ THIS.........................................
0 تعليقات